Illustrations
Illustrations are the conceptual portrait of the ICP. Not a depiction of what she does, but a statement about what it feels like to be her. Her domain doesn't contain her: she contains it. The objects of her work expand to environmental scale, activate, orbit, float, and swirl around her as a fixed point of authority. The composition is always charged. She is always in command.
This is a metaphorical register, not a realistic one. A stylist doesn't stand in a studio next to a rack. She wields a tape measure the size of a river. A designer isn't reviewing samples at a desk. She stands at the center of a room that is assembling itself around her. An event planner isn't on a call. She steps through the screen into the coordination itself. The professional's relationship to her work is what is being illustrated, not the work.
Illustrations occupy Q1 in the asset quadrant: expressive, high-register, hero-weight. One Q1 type per surface. An illustration does not share a composition with a motif or a working sketch. It has all the space, or it is not there.
Every illustration in the current library is built on the same underlying logic. Understanding it is the prerequisite for commissioning, generating, or evaluating any new work.
The figure is always the fixed point of the composition. She is still, centered, commanding. Everything else moves around or toward her. Her posture communicates authority: not aggressive, not posed, simply settled in her own domain.
The objects of her profession don't sit still at natural scale. They expand, orbit, float, swirl, or activate in response to her presence. A tape measure becomes a river she wields. Garments hang suspended in decision space. A room assembles itself around her. The environment is charged, not decorative.
Each illustration makes a specific claim about what it feels like to be this professional. Not what she does, what she is. Her domain doesn't contain her: she contains it. The brief must identify this claim before any composition decision is made.
Posture varies: directing, presiding, stepping through, leaning into. She is never overwhelmed, never reactive, never small. The emotional register is always: this is her world, and she knows it completely.
- Place on any palette background: Cotton, Parchment, or any core, soft, or strong color
- Match the figure's vertical to the content: a styling figure for styling content, an interiors figure for interiors content
- Give the illustration all the space it needs
- Connect the conceptual claim to the surrounding content
- Use multi-vertical illustrations for brand-level content that spans all three personas
- Test legibility of line work against the chosen background before use
- Share a surface with a motif or a working sketch (one Q1 asset per composition)
- Use decoratively when unrelated to the surrounding content
- Use a mismatched vertical figure when no approved figure exists for the required vertical
- Recolor figures or objects to match a surface's color scheme
- Use where the product needs to be shown. Use product asset types instead
- Crop the figure or remove the professional context
Run every candidate through these tests before submitting for approval. All must pass.
Can you state in one sentence what this illustration is claiming about the professional? If the answer is "she's working" or "she's at her desk," it is not a conceptual illustration. It is a portrait. Fail.
Is the figure the fixed, commanding point of the composition? Is she in relationship with her activated world rather than adjacent to it? If she reads as a bystander to her own environment, fail.
Is the figure's color correct for her persona? Are the objects drawn from the right professional world? An interiors object in a styling illustration, or the wrong color on the figure, fails.
Warm-line vector with intentional stroke weight variation. No gradients, glow, drop shadows, or texture. Does it look drawn? If it looks generated, rendered, or filtered, fail.
All colors from the Visualist system only. No pure black fills, no pure white, no off-palette colors. If a color can't be named in the palette, it doesn't belong.
Could this appear in a competitor's marketing without looking out of place? If yes, the conceptual claim is not specific enough to Visualist's ICP. Fail.
A brief that describes a scenario will produce literal work. A brief that identifies the metaphorical claim first will produce an illustration. The sequence matters: claim, then composition, then objects. Use the thought starters to orient yourself before opening the prompt architect.
Paste this into Claude, Gemini, or OpenAI. It will ask you questions and build a complete illustration brief iteratively. You do not need to know the brief structure or the ICP profiles before you start.
I want you to become my Illustration Prompt Architect for Visualist. Your objective is to help me create a complete, precise brief for a brand illustration. The brief you produce must follow a specific conceptual grammar that cannot be changed.
The grammar has one rule: the professional contains her domain. She is the fixed point of the composition. The objects of her work expand to environmental scale, activate, orbit, float, swirl, or suspend around her. She is never passive, never adjacent to her work, never performing for the viewer. She is at the center of gravity of her world. The composition makes a specific metaphorical claim about who she is and what her mastery means. The claim comes first. Everything else follows from it.
The three professional figures this system illustrates are: a personal stylist, whose domain includes garments, fabric, tape measures, hangers, lookbooks, pins, swatches, and racks; an interior designer, whose domain includes floor plans, material samples, furniture forms, scale models, tiles, paint swatches, and architectural drawings; and a wedding and event planner, whose domain includes seating charts, floral arrangements, table settings, timelines, venue plans, lighting rigs, and fabric lengths. A composition may also feature two or three of these professionals together.
Your response will follow this format after the first exchange:
Prompt: The complete illustration brief, written to five parts: (1) the claim stated as a single sentence, (2) the professional figure and her color palette, (3) the object world with scale and behavior described, (4) the posture, (5) the fixed parameters: warm-line vector style, transparent background, no effects, Visualist palette only, slightly stylized female-presenting figure with fully realized face and posture. Make this section stand out.
Possible Additions: Three specific additions to incorporate directly into the brief, listed A, B, C. Keep each concise. Focus on: object specificity, posture precision, compositional detail, color ground, or the scale relationship between figure and objects. Always update after every response.
Questions: Up to three questions to gather what you still need. Do not ask about things I have already answered. Focus on: what metaphorical claim the illustration should make, which professional figure or figures appear, what objects from her domain activate in the composition and how they behave, what her posture is, and what the color ground is. If I describe a mood or feeling rather than a specific scene, help me translate it into a claim and a composition.
Before we start, greet me and ask me one question only: what idea, moment, or feeling do I want this illustration to express? Tell me I can describe it however I like: a professional scenario, an abstract concept, a quality I want to communicate about the work. Do not display any sections or structure on this first response.
illustration-[sequence]-[slug].svg, for example: illustration-001-peyton-command.svgThe illustration system has evolved through three distinct generations. Understanding the evolution clarifies what the current standard requires and why earlier work is now legacy.
All approved V3 illustrations. Check here before commissioning new work.
V1 and V2 assets are held in the repository under assets/legacy/ and are not listed here.